
Previous Article
Full identification of acoustic sources with multiple frequencies and boundary measurements
 IPI Home
 This Issue

Next Article
Vector ellipsoidal harmonics and neuronal current decomposition in the brain
A timedomain probe method for threedimensional rough surface reconstructions
1.  Department of Mathematics, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 220, Berkshire, RG6 6AX, United Kingdom, United Kingdom 
In particular, we discuss the reconstruction of the shape of a rough surface in three dimensions from timedomain measurements of the scattered field. In practise, measurement data is collected where the incident field is given by a pulse. We formulate the timedomain field reconstruction problem equivalently via frequencydomain integral equations or via a retarded boundary integral equation based on results of Bamberger, HaDuong, Lubich. In contrast to pure frequency domain methods here we use a timedomain characterization of the unknown shape for its reconstruction.
Our paper will describe the TimeDomain Probe Method and relate it to previous frequencydomain approaches on sampling and probe methods by Colton, Kirsch, Ikehata, Potthast, Luke, Sylvester et al. The approach significantly extends recent work of ChandlerWilde and Lines (2005) and Luke and Potthast (2006) on the timedomain point source method. We provide a complete convergence analysis for the method for the rough surface scattering case and provide numerical simulations and examples.
[1] 
Michiyuki Watanabe. Inverse $N$body scattering with the timedependent hartreefock approximation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (3) : 499517. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021002 
[2] 
Jan Sokołowski, Jan Stebel. Shape optimization for nonNewtonian fluids in timedependent domains. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2014, 3 (2) : 331348. doi: 10.3934/eect.2014.3.331 
[3] 
Chan Liu, Jin Wen, Zhidong Zhang. Reconstruction of the timedependent source term in a stochastic fractional diffusion equation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 10011024. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020053 
[4] 
Bernard Ducomet. Asymptotics for 1D flows with timedependent external fields. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 323333. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.323 
[5] 
Yueqiang Shang, Qihui Zhang. A subgrid stabilizing postprocessed mixed finite element method for the timedependent NavierStokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2021, 26 (6) : 31193142. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020222 
[6] 
Masahiro Ikeda, Ziheng Tu, Kyouhei Wakasa. Small data blowup of semilinear wave equation with scattering dissipation and timedependent mass. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021 doi: 10.3934/eect.2021011 
[7] 
Mourad Choulli, Yavar Kian. Stability of the determination of a timedependent coefficient in parabolic equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2013, 3 (2) : 143160. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2013.3.143 
[8] 
Feng Zhou, Chunyou Sun, Xin Li. Dynamics for the damped wave equations on timedependent domains. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2018, 23 (4) : 16451674. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018068 
[9] 
Stephen Anco, Maria Rosa, Maria Luz Gandarias. Conservation laws and symmetries of timedependent generalized KdV equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2018, 11 (4) : 607615. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018035 
[10] 
Fengjuan Meng, Meihua Yang, Chengkui Zhong. Attractors for wave equations with nonlinear damping on timedependent space. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2016, 21 (1) : 205225. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.205 
[11] 
Tingting Liu, Qiaozhen Ma. Timedependent asymptotic behavior of the solution for plate equations with linear memory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2018, 23 (10) : 45954616. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018178 
[12] 
Ying Sui, Huimin Yu. Singularity formation for compressible Euler equations with timedependent damping. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (10) : 49214941. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021062 
[13] 
Matti Viikinkoski, Mikko Kaasalainen. Shape reconstruction from images: Pixel fields and Fourier transform. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (3) : 885900. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.885 
[14] 
Mikko Kaasalainen. Multimodal inverse problems: Maximum compatibility estimate and shape reconstruction. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2011, 5 (1) : 3757. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.37 
[15] 
Alexander Zlotnik, Ilya Zlotnik. Finite element method with discrete transparent boundary conditions for the timedependent 1D Schrödinger equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2012, 5 (3) : 639667. doi: 10.3934/krm.2012.5.639 
[16] 
Lekbir Afraites, Chorouk Masnaoui, Mourad Nachaoui. Shape optimization method for an inverse geometric source problem and stability at critical shape. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2021 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021006 
[17] 
Qiwei Wu, Liping Luan. Largetime behavior of solutions to unipolar EulerPoisson equations with timedependent damping. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (3) : 9951023. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021003 
[18] 
Toshiyuki Suzuki. Scattering theory for semilinear Schrödinger equations with an inversesquare potential via energy methods. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2019, 8 (2) : 447471. doi: 10.3934/eect.2019022 
[19] 
Roman Chapko. On a Hybrid method for shape reconstruction of a buried object in an elastostatic half plane. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2009, 3 (2) : 199210. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.199 
[20] 
Mohammed Al Horani, Angelo Favini, Hiroki Tanabe. Inverse problems for evolution equations with time dependent operatorcoefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2016, 9 (3) : 737744. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016025 
2020 Impact Factor: 1.639
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]