Research Paper Volume 13, Issue 20 pp 23672—23688
Differences in and verification of genetic alterations in chemotherapy and immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma
- 1 Department of Dermatology, The Affiliated Qingdao Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- 2 Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Qingdao Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
Received: July 28, 2021 Accepted: September 29, 2021 Published: October 21, 2021https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.203640
How to Cite
Copyright: © 2021 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Background: Metastatic melanoma has poor therapeutic response and may present resistance to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Significant differences are observed in the survival time of patients with metastatic melanoma based on the administration of chemotherapy or immunotherapy; thus, we have explored the important role of specific differential genes between the two therapies in their effect on treatment response in melanoma.
Methods: Metastatic melanoma gene expression data (RNAseq, mutation and methylation) and patient clinical information were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and grouped according to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The differentially expressed genes of the two groups were further screened for signature genes through a protein–protein interaction network and Lasso-Cox regression model. Then, differences in the treatment response, overall survival, mutation and methylation of characteristic genes were compared. Finally, western blot and real-time qPCR technology were used to detect the expression differences of the signature genes in metastatic melanoma tumor tissues in patients undergoing chemotherapy and immunotherapy.
Results: The overall survival of the chemotherapy-based treatment group was significantly higher than that of the immunotherapy-based group. The immune infiltration level of immature dendritic cells (DCs) in the chemotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the immunotherapy group. Finally, seven signature genes were selected: CCKBR, KCNJ11, NMU, MMP13, ITGA10, IGFBP1 and CEACAM5. The results of these signature genes were significantly differentiated between the chemotherapy and immunotherapy groups in terms of overall survival and disease progression in response to treatment. In addition, differences in the expression of these genes were verified by western blot and real-time qPCR.
Conclusion: In this study, significant differences in the expression of signature genes were verified. The findings indicate that immature DCs with potential application value should be considered and high mutation sites of signature genes should be identified to reduce the occurrence of treatment resistance.