Research Paper Volume 14, Issue 1 pp 477—496
Gut microbiota in patients with Alzheimer’s disease spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1 Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- 2 Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics (BIND Lab), Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- 3 Department of Neurology and Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- 4 Department of Cognitive Health Science, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer (IDAC), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
- 5 Smart Aging Research Center (S.A.R.C), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
- 6 Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- 7 Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan
Received: August 27, 2021 Accepted: December 20, 2021 Published: January 14, 2022
https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.203826How to Cite
Copyright: © 2022 Hung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Context: Gut dysbiosis has been proposed as one of pathologies in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) spectrum. Despite such enthusiasm, the relevant results remain substantially controversial.
Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the differences of gut microbiota (GM) between patients with AD spectrum (including mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and AD) and healthy controls (HC).
Data sources: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to August 2021.
Eligibility criteria for study selection: Observational trials and pre-intervention data of intervention trials that investigated the abundance of GM in patients with AD spectrum and HC.
Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently identified articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias. The effect sizes were performed by a random-effect, inverse-variance weighted model. The effects of different countries and of clinical stages on GM abundance were also examined.
Results: 11 studies consisting of 378 HC and 427 patients with AD spectrum were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with AD, but not MCI, showed significantly reduced GM diversity as compared to HC. We also found more abundance of Proteobacteria, Bifidobacterium and Phascolarctobacterium, but less abundance of Firmicutes, Clostridiaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Rikenellaceae in patients with AD spectrum as compared with HC. The profiles of abundance of Alistipes and Bacteroides in HC and AD spectrum were differentially affected by countries. Finally, when considering clinical stage as a moderator, the comparisons of abundance in Clostridiaceae and Phascolarctobacterium showed large effect sizes, with gradient changes from MCI to AD stage.
Limitations: The inclusion of studies originating only from China and the U.S. was a possible limitation.
Conclusions: Patients with AD spectrum demonstrated altered GM abundance, which was differentially mediated by countries and clinical stages.